*The Cold War Lives On: Gorbachev Exposes Global Communist Environmentalism Conspiracy.

Posted: December 10, 2009 in 2009, Exclusives

Ignorance Is Futile:

The collapse of the Soviet Union didn’t mark the end of the Cold War. The Cold War never ended, and we’re losing this war. As the collapse became imminent, they were already enacting their final strategy. The case is rather simple, and Mikhail Gorbachev is the key.

“Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about Glasnost and Perestroika and democracy in the coming years. They are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal changes in the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.” -Mikhail Gorbachev, speech to the Soviet Politburo, November 1987

As the Soviet collapse became imminent in the final years, the Communist strategy became to infiltrate global environmental organizations. Gorbachev was active in this effort as early as 1990.

In 1992, the year following the Soviet collapse, the framework was already underway following the UN’s Earth Summit, after which he founded Green Cross International (GCI) officially in 1993. That same year, Gorbachev’s GCI was the fountainhead of the infamous Kyoto summit, during which he sat as the president of the proceedings. In the video above he actually ‘jokes’ about being the “dictator” of the conference.

The idea of Gorbachev legitimately being en environmentalist is even more absurd than the idea of Al Gore truly being ‘green’:

Formerly leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev is now one of the world’s most vocal global warming activists. This is an unlikely role indeed for a man who during his years in power showed no inclination to address environmental issues. This could not have been for lack of opportunity, given that he presided over a country which suffered from extensive ecological damage wrought by years of gross disregard and mismanagement. Had he had the inclination, there was much to do about the lamentable state of his country’s environmental condition. Gorbachev, however, not only did nothing, but brazenly continued the Soviet regime’s ecologically disastrous policies.

But nothing revealed his true attitudes more glaringly than the explosion of a nuclear reactor at Chernobyl. His first reaction was not to launch a clean-up operation, but to conceal the fact. Initially he denied that anything happened at all. Then, when radioactive clouds reached countries hundreds of kilometers away, he claimed that it was only a ‘minor’ accident. It was only under the pressure of growing evidence that Gorbachev finally admitted the truth. While mounting the cover-up, the time and energy that could have been used to contend with the unfolding ecological catastrophe were irretrievably lost. But that was not all, for Gorbachev also decided to sacrifice the lives of thousands whom he refused to evacuate or even notify of the danger. Scores died and countless others suffered from diseases caused by exposure to radiation. Many could have been saved had Gorbachev done the decent thing. Chernobyl thus stands as tragic evidence of Gorbachev’s disdain both for nature and human life which, sadly, is all too often found in those who espouse the communist worldview.

The idea to infiltrate environmentalist organizations was a smart move, as with the right propaganda and phony climate fraud environmentalists would be easy targets as unwitting minions. You see with an issue like Global Warming, the only way it could be solved, if it even could, assuming it were real, would be by a global government dictating and rationing the worlds resources.

As it turns out, that exact thing is being worked towards, as we speak, in Copenhagen. It’s no wonder they also have the head of the UN post op-eds calling for climate based global government, as this year the New York Times hired Mikhail as an op-ed columnist. His column from today is titled “We Have a Real Emergency“, and in it he urges the typical ‘we need a global government to stop catastrophic climate change’ type rhetoric. Similar words are found in another op-ed he wrote earlier this year:

The second question concerns the G-20’s place within the system of global institutions. What is this group: a “global politburo,” a “club of the powerful,” a prototype for a world government? How will it interact with the United Nations?
www.nytimes.com…

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore eventually left the organization as after the ‘end of the Cold War’, communists hijacked the movement including the organization he helped create:

(After the Cold War ‘ended’) “suddenly, the international peace movement had a lot less to do. Pro-Soviet groups in the West were discredited. Many of their members moved into the environmental movement, bringing with them their eco-Marxism and pro-Sandinista sentiments.

“A lot of those in the peace movement were anti-American and, to an extent, pro-Soviet. By virtue of their anti-Americanism, they tended to sometimes favor the communist approach. A lot of those people, a lot of those social activists, moved into the environmental movement once the peace movement was no longer relevant.” Social activists, he suggests, “are now using the rhetoric of environmentalism to promote other collectivist agendas, such as class struggle — which I personally believe is a legitimate area, but I don’t believe it’s legitimate to mix it up with environmentalism.”
findarticles.com…

I argue that the UN and the co-opted Environmentalist movement are key facets in the “ruthless and monolithic conspiracy” that JFK warned us all about, as I showcased in my new short film exposing the Climategate UN-IPCC data manipulation scheme to trump up phony “Global Warming” hysteria, in the context of the “New World Order”:

At the end of the video, after all the leaked CRU emails, numerous Western world leaders are shown calling for global government, aka a “new world order” headed by the UN. As it turns out, Mikhail has been calling for the same thing for many decades:

“In October, 1917 we parted with the Old World, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a New World, a world of Communism. We shall NEVER turn off that road.” -Mikhail Gorbachev at the Kremlin in Moscow, Nov. 2, 1987

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address to the United Nations, December 1988

Today, virtually all world leaders are openly calling for a UN headed “New World Order” global government as I chronicled here: *When all major world leaders openly call for global government.

Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, former ‘prisoner’ (hypothetically) of the Soviet system explain the parallels between Communism and modern Environmentalism:

Czech prez: Environmentalism is new communism:

As the House Energy and Commerce Committee prepares to question former Vice President Al Gore tomorrow morning about global warming, Czech President Vaclav Klaus is warning congressmen that environmental extremism is the modern equivalent of communism.

Responding yesterday to U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, and former House Speaker Denny Hastert, R-Ill., the Czech leader said: “It becomes evident that while discussing climate we are not witnessing a clash of views about the environment, but a clash of views about human freedom.”

“As someone who lived under communism for most of my life I feel obliged to say that the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its various softer variants,” said Klaus, responding to questions posed by the two lawmakers. “Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism.”

The UN global government structure concept can be best compared to the European Union, to which Klaus also compares to the Soviet Union:

The Czech Republic’s leader has long been one of the most strident critics of the European Union, blasting the bloc with withering attacks at every opportunity. Now he has inherited the ideal pulpit to air his views: The EU presidency itself.

In a startling diatribe before EU legislators Thursday, Czech President Vaclav Klaus, whose country assumed the rotating EU helm in January from France, branded the club an undemocratic and elitist project comparable to Soviet-era dictatorships that forbade free thought.

Despite the uproar, this is hardly uncharacteristic of a deeply Euroskeptic leader who has refused to fly the EU flag over his official seat in Prague during the Czech presidency, saying the country is not an EU province.

“Not so long ago,” Klaus thundered, “in our part of Europe we lived in a political system that permitted no alternatives and therefore also no parliamentary opposition. We learned the bitter lesson that with no opposition, there is no freedom.”

And here a famous Soviet dissident also outlines the ways the European Union is the new Soviet Union:

The UK’s Nigel Farage speaking truth to power in the EU parliment:

Facts suggest that the Rothschild’s & Rockefeller’s are behind the EU, Federal Reserve and UN, while many argue that they’re also behind the origins of Communism.

Leftists Noam Chomsky & John Pilger have argued for many years that the Cold War was just a phony scheme perpetrated by both sides to justify taking over the world. I mean, obviously each side did do this, but the jist I’ve gotten from both of them implies what could be described as a sort of collaboration, much like the Democrats & Republicans.

The elitist families I named were and are key figures behind the UN. So even if they didn’t encourage Communism, it could be said that the elites from both sides eventually came to have a meeting of the minds. Why wouldnt they? The elites from each side both seek to dominate the entire world, yet couldnt defeat each other. At the same time, the ethics of each side are consumed in control freak domination. Considering that, the idea of them having a meeting of the minds later on is perfectly plausible.

Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.– David Rockefeller

In any case, no matter how you slice it, we’re on the verge of a communistic global dictatorship and the time to act is now.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. CEOCoach says:

    Some good information collected here. However, note that Vaclav Klaus does not say, “Environmentalism is the new communism.” He very specifically says to not quote him as saying this. Don’t blur his accurate message.

    He does say that “environmentalism is the new collectivistic, anti-individualistic ideology which puts something else at the top of priorities, not human freedom and democracy. In this sense, there are some structural similarities “.

    What he is saying is very important for people to understand. The way in which this new model is being developed to fool the masses into inviting collectivist / socialist controls via the Climate Change, environmentalism platform. By the way, this is nothing new which is why Klaus knows it so well and warns of its danger. Roots of NWO started in late 1800’s and continue to today. COP15 treaty is the ultimate play leveraging the “environmental disaster that would usher in one world governance” statement by Gorbachev in 1992 (Global 2000). This is by far the closest NWO architects have come to getting the masses to go along with the kool-aid.

    Very important to keep very accurate in quotes or the whole story loses credibility. Klaus states it perfectly.

  2. Signals says:

    A very nice excellent article!

    I was wondering how you stand regarding copyright and possibly reproducing this article on another blog? Thanks for this, I already knew about the whole thing about the cold war and the “red and blue” factions the world was divided into at that time, but I wasn’t aware of just how blatant the connection between communism (and or socialism) and environmentalism really was.

  3. Signals says:

    By the way, I’d love to trade links, we’re developing a website called Occult secrets and Mystery Babylon EXPOSED (occultsecrets.weebly.com), it’s not yet fully fleshed out but the blog already has a lot of info posted and we plan on becoming a significant “database” of sorts, in some time.

  4. Dorothee Krien says:

    See also the very important videos:


    George Hunt on the Gang behind Earth-Summit Part 1

    http://thebigbadbank.com Rothschild vs George Hunt.
    Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming

  5. Josiah Daniel Valdez says:

    Who is like the Soviet Union and who is able to stand against her power?

  6. Santa Baby says:

    Very difficult to find this article. And most of the YouTube videos are broken? Some people don’t like this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s